Saturday, April 11, 2015

Yeah, tell me why you’re here again...


Finding out that ‘The Drop’ was adapted from a short story begins to explain a few things, for the main complaint I have with the film is that it feels like a lot of floating sub-plots and no real meat to hold it all together.  It’s so loosely composed that it somewhat feels empty and hollow, despite having a lot going on.

Sadly, I don’t care about any of it.



Michael R. Roskam’s adaptation of Dennis Lehane’s ‘Animal Rescue’ is a droll film that tries to cover a lot of space with very little storyline, thus stretching itself far too thin and appearing as if it actually had absolutely nothing to say; which it very well may not.  The story (or stories) consist of a botched robbery, a shady bar owner, an employee with a past, a girlfriend with baggage and an abused dog.  All of these parts create a whole that doesn’t feel like it cares much for any of the parts and so, in the end, I didn’t care about any of it either.

You know, except for that one moment when Tom Hardy gets all ‘tough as nails’ in the bar and delivers the adrenaline shock the film so desperately needed.  A little too little too late if you ask me.

I feel like I should have more to say, but I kind of don’t.  The cast is truly exceptional and yet no one does anything exceptional here, except for Hardy in that one moment.  Gandolfini (rest his soul) is fine, as is Noomi Rapace (she needs a good role, and soon) and Matthias Schoenaerts is as expected (stereotypical at this point), but no one is given enough to work with; sadly.  Gandolfini probably has the deepest character arc, but the film doesn’t really care about his character.  It’s more concerned with building some kind of tension between Hardy, Schoenaerts and a dog.  Poor Rapace is saddled with the ‘stock girlfriend with a past we don’t hear enough about because we’d rather be concerned with your idiot ex-boyfriend’ role, and when all is said and done and realities are revealed we are left with a film that feels shallow and underdeveloped.

And pointless.



Which is an absolute shame.

D.

8 comments:

  1. Man, that must've been terrible. I heard mixed reviews about this. If it's on TV, I'll check it out.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sounds like a miss but I do like the dog:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The dog subplot was so...annoying though!

      Delete
  3. "...it feels like a lot of floating sub-plots and no real meat to hold it all together" That's a shame given the cast. I almost went to the screening because of Hardy but in the end I wasn't interested enough to go. Heh, sounds like I'm not missing much.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hardy has his moments of actually being great here, but this is one of those instances where a tapestry of plot points really hurts the overall impact of the film.

      Delete
  4. Ouch. I loved it when I first saw it, and it still got lost in the shuffle at the year's end. The cast is great, though not flashy and saddled with undeveloped characters. Still, I liked the atmosphere of the movie. :/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know I wanted to like this, considering my overall love and heart-pains over Gandolfini...and I tried...but at the end of the day I just couldn't care about this at all.

      Delete